General Information

The IRB was established by SAGU in accordance with Federal Regulations (45 CFR 46) to review research conducted with human subjects by faculty, staff, students, and external researchers. The reason for establishing the IRB was to ensure the safety, privacy, and well-being of all human subjects throughout the research process.

Research conducted with human subjects is regulated through the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services. All proposed research to be conducted with human subjects must be reviewed and approved by the IRB, which is registered with the OHRP: the IORG number for SAGU’s IRB is 0008713.

Institutional Review Board Statement of Purpose - Mission Statement

The purpose of SAGU’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to aid researchers academically and professionally by ensuring they conduct research on human subjects in accordance with Christian principles, federal regulations, and the best practices of the academic and scientific communities.

The IRB Review Process

What is involved in the IRB review process?

Through both initial and periodic reviews of ongoing research, the IRB assures the University that appropriate steps are being taken to protect the rights and welfare of humans participating as subjects in research. The IRB typically uses a group process in which its members review a completed application for IRB approval and its related materials (e.g., informed consent documents), then reach a decision about the ethical acceptability of the proposed (or ongoing) study.

Will my proposed study be considered research with human subjects?

  What is “research” as defined by the IRB?
  • “Research" refers to a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. (Taken from Office for Human Research Protections)

  What are “human subjects” as defined by the IRB?
  • “Human subjects” are living individuals about whom an investigator obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individuals, or (2) identifiable private information (IPI). (If the researcher collects IPI, the identity of the subjects is or may readily be ascertained by the investigator or associated with the information.) (Taken from Office for Human Research Protections)

Seeking IRB Approval

What are the steps required to obtain IRB approval of my research protocol?

Four key steps are involved when seeking IRB approval:

  1. Secure approval of your proposed study by your research committee. (The approved proposal is one of the required addendums to the IRB application.).
  2. Download and complete the SAGU IRB Approval Application.
  3. Submit the application for review after attaching all requested documents. These include:
    • the research proposal approved by the research committee
    • the certificate of completion for the Protecting Human Research Participants course
    • the Informed Consent document
  4. Await IRB approval before engaging in any data collection from human subjects, including pilot testing.

Note: The decision to approve the protocol will be communicated in writing (via e-mail) by the IRB Chairperson.

What is the timeline for the review?

The IRB reviews protocol applications in the order in which they are received. The review process normally takes one month or less, based on when the complete application is received. Incomplete application packets will inevitably delay the review process, as they will be returned to the sponsoring faculty supervisor for completion.

What do I do if my research protocol is not approved by the IRB?

If your application for IRB approval is not approved, you will be informed in writing (via e-mail) of that decision. Your advisor and the Dean of the Harrison Graduate School will also be notified. You will also be informed why that decision was reached and the steps you can take to refine the study’s design so that the IRB would be willing to review the revised protocol.

Note: you must not proceed with data collection without IRB approval of your protocol.

Instructions to Student Researchers

Following approval of their proposals by their supervisors, student researchers must apply to the IRB for approval to conduct research with human subjects. The IRB application consists of a detailed protocol of the proposed research to ensure that the methods proposed conform to ethical guidelines for research with human subjects. Student researchers are responsible to initiate this review process.

All student researchers conducting research on human subjects must complete the online short course entitled “Protecting Human Research Subjects”, offered by the National Institute of Health (NIH). Student researchers are strongly encouraged to complete this certification prior to developing their research proposals involving human subjects. A copy of the NIH certificate must be included with each research protocol application submitted to the IRB.

Frequently Asked Questions

About the IRB

What is an IRB?

“A specifically constituted review body established or designated by an entity to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects recruited to participate in biomedical or behavioral or social science research.” (Mayo Clinic:

“An IRB is an appropriately constituted group that has been formally designated to review and monitor biomedical research involving human subjects. In accordance with FDA regulations, an IRB has the authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove research. This group review serves an important role in the protection of the rights and welfare of human research subjects.

The purpose of IRB review is to assure, both in advance and by periodic review, that appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of humans participating as subjects in the research. To accomplish this purpose, IRBs use a group process to review research protocols and related materials (e.g., informed consent documents and investigator brochures) to ensure protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects of research.”

An Institutional Review Board is an officially constituted committee established by a university to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects by:

  1. Reviewing the research proposals of student researchers (and other researchers seeking approval to conduct research at the university);
  2. Monitoring the ongoing research efforts by all researchers who receive initial approval to conduct research with human subjects;
  3. Promoting in various contexts the practice of ethical research.
Why did SAGU establish an IRB?

The IRB at SAGU was established to ensure and promote the best practice of research with human subjects as a category V university that offers advanced degrees requiring research. A primary advantage of establishing the IRB was the facilitation of grant writing for doctoral research in the fields of mental health and education, and for federally funded or approved research projects.

What is the role of IRB members?

Federal regulations require that each IRB Committee will be comprised of at least five members who vary in gender, educational backgrounds and professional expertise, such that they are to provide complete and thorough review of research activities commonly conducted by the Institution.

Each IRB committee includes at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in non-scientific areas. Further, each IRB committee includes at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the University.

The IRB members fall into three distinct categories: the chair, the University-affiliated members and the non-affiliated members.

If my research committee approves my proposal, why is IRB approval needed?

Your research committee evaluates your research proposal with a focus on study’s research design, principally focusing on its relevance to the body of knowledge and its credibility as judged by the empirical literature. Your committee members will require you to address research ethics in your research proposal; but typically do not have advanced training in the understanding and application of federal research requirements and guidelines.

What is the relationship between my supervisor/advisor and the IRB?

Your supervisor or advisor and all but one member of the IRB are colleagues at the University.

In the review of your research protocol, however, members of your research committee do not interface with the IRB. Should one of your committee members also be a member of the IRB, that person will recuse himself or herself from the IRB’s deliberations.

IRB Committee

Contact Person:
Marvin Gilbert, EdD
IRB Chair

Committee Members:

  • Rob Blakney, DMin (Associate Dean: Harrison Graduate School)
  • Danón Carter, IRB Vice-Chair, DM (business)
  • LaShera McElhany, PhD (education)
  • John Savell, PhD (psychology)
  • Shelly McMullin, PhD cand. (institutional research)
  • Terry Minter, PhD, DMin (Bible-theology)
  • Loyd Uglow, PhD (history)
  • Marcus Alexander, PhD (community representative)
  • Elizabeth Ortiz, PhD (community representative)
Back to Top